I am a member of the excellent Authors Electric group. If you haven’t checked it out online then you’re missing a treat. Click on Authors Electric to have a peek. Why am I telling you this? Well, it’s because a request was made by Ann Evans, one of my Authors Electric colleagues for willing guinea pigs to produce a blog post for the “My Writing Process” blog tour. And in my usual jump before you think mode, I stuck my hand up and said “me, me”. After which came, “groan, groan”, I’m going to have to write it now. Well, time has rolled on in its usual relentless fashion, and today is my day to answer the questions I’ve been given and to impose the answers on you.
You can check out Ann’s blog at http://annsawriter.blogspot.co.uk/. Thank you for inviting me to join the blog tour, Ann.
1) What am I working on?
As you probably already know I’ve written three books in The Dundee Crime Series, which to my surprise have been tremendously popular. I’ve also written a historical saga set in the 1830s. Now you might think given the popularity of The Dundee Crime Series, my new book would be number four, a contemporary crime novel set in
you would be wrong. Oh, the book is set in Dundee,
so no surprises there. And it’s crime, again no surprises. But it’s a
historical one this time – got you! You see, I decided to combine my two
interests, crime and social history, into a new novel which might just be the
start of a new series.
The story was inspired by
first policewoman, although that is where the similarity ends. My policewoman
starts out in London, but is sent to Dundee at the request of the Chief Constable. When the
women police (a voluntary force) were formed in 1914 she was one of the first
to join. And like a lot of the early policewomen, she has a suffragette
background. I bet you didn’t know that the origins of the women’s police
included suffragette organisations, such as the Women’s Freedom League (WFL),
and the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU). Anyway, she gets sent to Dundee and is immediately embroiled in a murder with
satanic undertones, while at the same time fighting against prejudice from the
male police force.
This novel was originally written several years ago and it was one of the twenty winners of an international competition for the best crime novel by an unpublished crime writer, all this was before I was published. However, a succession of editors insisted on changes which tore the heart out of the novel, and in my opinion completely destroyed it. At the end of the day it had become such a mess that it wasn’t published. So, this year I have torn it to pieces, completely rewritten it, and I hope my readers will like it. I’m currently at the revision and editing stage and just about ready to send it out to my two editors, one edits for content and the other for grammar. These editors are far superior to the ones supplied to me by the publishing firm that organised the competition, so there’s no danger they will spoil the book.
I reckon this book will probably be published in late February or March, so watch this space.
2) How does my work differ from others of its genre?
All writers think their work differs from that of other writers, and I certainly wouldn’t want to mimic another writer, no matter how successful. I write in different genres, but considering I’m known mainly as a crime novelist, I will focus on the Dundee Crime Series. As far as I’m concerned I think this contemporary crime series does differ from many others. The books are often listed as police procedurals, but although many of my police characters remain the same in each book (it would be a nonsense to change the Dundee Police Force each time), they are not really the main characters. My main characters are the victims, the suspects, or the perpetrators, which means the books also fit into the noir genre. The other thing is that each book is different because the police are not the main characters. Night Watcher is a revenge thriller. Dead Wood is a cross between a police procedural, and a woman in peril thriller. While Missing Believed Dead is a psychological thriller as well as a police procedural. I like to get into the heads of my characters, and the more twisted the character, the better.
3) Why do I write what I do?
I suppose I write about what interests me. I’ve always been interested in social history, not the kings and queens and lords and ladies stuff, but how the ordinary people lived and survived in times gone past. So that’s where my saga and historical crime comes from. As for my contemporary crime, I suppose that’s because it has always been my favourite reading, from my teenage devourment of Agatha Christie, on to my more modern favourites Jeffrey Deaver, Val McDermid, Mo Hayder, Denise Mina, and loads more.
The suspense in my writing probably originates from my horror phase, starting with Bram Stoker’s Dracula, and on through James Herbert, Stephen King, and Dean Koontz. Koontz in particular is a master of suspense. The darkness of my characters arises from my interest in psychology and what makes someone do something evil.
I’m sure there are many more influences, but those are the main ones.
4) How does your writing process work?
This is a really difficult question to answer because I really don’t know. I’m what is known as a pantster. I do not plot or plan the book I am writing, which I am told is unusual for a crime writer. I start out with one scene involving a character and take it from there. I write the scene, and then play the “what if” game, and so the next scene is born, and I carry on in that fashion until the end of the book. I reckon if I can’t surprise myself by what will happen, then I won’t surprise the reader.
One thing I do believe is that a writer has to write. It’s like any job of work, there may be days when I am not in the mood, but I have to force myself into the chair and force my fingers onto the keyboard, or if you’re a pencil and paper writer, you must grasp the pencil firmly and write. It’s possible what has been written may have to be junked, but it is important to keep the writing muscle active. It’s like any other muscle – you use it or lose it.
The other thing that is really important is the editing phase, and I don’t mean checking for spelling and grammar mistakes. Editing is dissecting what has been written and deciding if it can be improved. It involves a lot of rewriting, and when I am satisfied it’s as good as it can be, I send it out to my editors whose opinion I value.
* * * *
Next week the following three authors will be telling you about their writing process
Melanie Robertson King will be talking about her writing process on Monday 20th January, on her blog, which is here – http://www.melanierobertson-king.com/wp02/
Melanie lives in
and she writes time travel and contemporary romance set in Scotland.
Pauline Barclay will be writing about her writing process on Monday 20th January on her blog, and you’ll find her at – http://paulinembarclay.blogspot.co.uk/
Pauline says “My passion is to write about events that happen in life and change everything for those involved as well as those caught up in the maelstrom. I want my characters to sit at your side, steal your attention and sweep you up in their story.”
Tanya J Peterson talks about her writing process on Monday 20th January, on her blog at http://tanyajpeterson.com/blog/
Tanya J Peterson is a columnist for HealthyPlace.com as well as a novelist. The themes of her novels address the impact of mental illness on people as well as the human capacity for healing.
* * *
Thank you for visiting my blog and reading about my writing process.